charlesk wrote:
>
>>Would this be sufficient?
>
>>Or you need to have both JSON providers active at the same time within a
> single application?
> Each processing a distinct set of classes?
>
> Hi Jakub,
> I believe it is sufficient. But having some configuration to pick
> different providers would be nice!
> Thanks.
>
I meant configuring different providers amongst active JSON providers.
--
View this message in context: http://jersey.576304.n2.nabble.com/Jersey-with-Jackson-for-JSON-tp6480924p6596316.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.