users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Adam Walczak <me_at_adamwalczak.info>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:26 +0200

I vote for:

Mercurial
>

It's getting most momentum among Java projects.

It seams to have a cleaner design while git looks to me like a unix hack :o)

-- 
Adam Walczak
www.adamwalczak.info
+48 604 188 992

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Imran M Yousuf: "[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?"
Previous message: Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru): "[Jersey] Jersey source code pointers"
In reply to: Marek Potociar: "[Jersey] SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?"
Next in thread: NBW: "[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?"
Reply: NBW: "[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]