[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?

From: Markus Karg <>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:03:42 +0200

You misunderstood my assumption. As currently the code IS in a SVN
repository, anybody is able to deal with it. Whether or not you are
using SVN directly or via GIT doesn't play a role. Anybody currently
using the code, is using the SVN repository. Maybe manually, maybe using
a frontend. But it IS SVN.


From: [] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Dienstag, 12. April 2011 16:02
Subject: [Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?


On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Markus Karg <> wrote:

[...] But if you want to know what is best for *users* then just stick
with SVN as 100% of your current users already are using it to read your
repo [...]

False. I use git for all SVN interaction. I haven't actually counted,
but I think this thread has shown that the Jersey users represented so
far prefer git, not SVN.