On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Marc Hadley-2 [via Jersey]
<ml-node+4950229-1830360492-210534_at_n2.nabble.com> wrote:
> I think the current behavior is correct. "object class" is a poor choice of
> phrase, it should be "entity object's class" or "the class of the entity
> object" instead. The intent is that writers whose generic type is closer to
> the actual type of the object being written are sorted ahead of those
> further away. This sorting allows more specific writers to override more
> generic ones.
Pardon the dumb question, but I can still plonk an MBW<Object> down
and expect it to be called for everything, right, even though Jersey
might supply something like, e.g., MBW<String>?
Best,
Laird
--
View this message in context: http://jersey.576304.n2.nabble.com/Deployment-provider-recognized-but-not-instantiated-tp4945569p4950482.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.