On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Marc Hadley-2 [via Jersey]
<ml-node+4903420-1907593435-210534_at_n2.nabble.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:32 PM, ljnelson wrote:
> The Type argument would be an instance of ParameterizedType whose getRawType
> would return List.class and whose getActualTypeArguments() would return an
> array of [String.class]. (I think).
Another question on this sort of thing: the T that comes in to
writeTo() in MessageBodyWriter is accompanied by a Class<?>. Was this
supposed to be Class<T>? Or was the intent that any old class could
show up here?
This leads to my next question. The first thing I need to do in my
"chaining" MessageBodyWriter is to ask Providers for another one that
matches. I'm armed at this point with a T, and a Class<?>. But
Providers#getMessageBodyWriter() needs a Class argument that has as
its parameter T. It would seem that I can't guarantee this. What's
your advice?
Best,
Laird
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Type-argument-in-MessageBodyWriter-methods-tp4902440p4903878.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.