It might be that I was missing the obvious but personally I never
realised there was a correlation between JAX-RS and Jersey versions.
Seems to me going from 1.1.5 -> 2.0 will require explanation to those
who know there was such a correlation in the first place and will
largely be forgotten once the initial confusion has been overcome,
whereas 1.1.5 -> 3.0 will require explanation to everybody else and will
always be required to explain the absence of a 2.0.
I guess the sensible route would be the one that requires the least
explanation to the least people.
Tim
________________________________
From: Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM]
Sent: 08 January 2010 13:32
To: users_at_jersey.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: [Jersey] Releasing Jersey 1.1.5 on the week of Jan
18th
On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Sudhakar Kumar wrote:
As a developer, I don't see the cause for confusion
between the versions of Jersey and JAX-RS. Introducing 2.0 or 3.0 when
there is no reason to do so is a permanent confusion in my opinion.
I did give a reason, of course it may not be a *good* enough
reason to justify such a version change.
Thoughts from the community?
Yes please, the current input is most helpful but more would
help me better decide on what direction to take.
Paul.
Click here
<
https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==
reeIhdqve!sdq8lT7MZG9lFFc2FnPFlOZ5rwq3xXRfv08Q==> to report this email
as spam.
If you are not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication and its attachments in error, please return the original message and attachments to the sender using the reply facility on e-mail.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Cambridge Assessment (the brand name for the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, the constituent elements of which are CIE, ESOL and OCR [Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations is a Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England. Registered office: 1 Hills Road, Cambridge CB1 2EU. Company number: 3484466]) does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Cambridge Assessment unless otherwise specifically stated.
The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and your reply cannot be guaranteed.