You could also name it Guernsey and start again with 1.0 ;-)
From: erdincyilmazel_at_gmail.com [mailto:erdincyilmazel_at_gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Erdinc Yilmazel
Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2010 13:53
To: users_at_jersey.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: [Jersey] Releasing Jersey 1.1.5 on the week of Jan 18th
Why not 2.0?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com> wrote:
Hi,
We plan to release Jersey 1.1.5 on the week on Jan 18th.
Jakub is working hard on the OSGi stuff but we want to make sure we get it
right, and it might require some more soak time in the trunk (currently it
is in a branch) for other developers to have a play with and provide
feedback.
After that release i am proposing to change the versioning scheme of Jersey.
Currently we retain the first two numbers as the major and minor version of
the JAX-RS API Jersey implementations. This is not ideal:
1) Jersey has it's own API that evolves separately it makes it harder to
signal major, minor, micro status of Jersey itself;
2) The current versioning scheme does not work very well with maven and
OSGi, for example 1.1.4.1; and
3) Then we can consider Markus recommendations for declaring version ranges
for dependencies.
I have been advised that to avoid confusion with the JAX-RS version we
should choose a version of Jersey that is clearly different. Thus i propose
that we start the next version at 3.0, even though of course it does not
really represent a major change.
Paul.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net