users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Spell out generics limitations?

From: ljnelson <ljnelson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:48:52 -0500 (CDT)

2009/9/1 Felipe Gaúcho (via Nabble)
<ml-user+51595-186651138_at_n2.nabble.com<ml-user%2B51595-186651138_at_n2.nabble.com>
>

> welcome to the club, Laird :)
>
> everyone is doing the same and everyone rollback to some copy point
> after few trials.. let's wait for the advent of the Sandoz solution...
> and then we can start to cleanup again..
>

:-D As it happens, I don't really mind having to subclass, since I don't
really want to expose a generic DAO to everyone in the world--only for
specific object types. Additionally, I have to make the thing accessible
for @EJB injection, so I need the concrete type information for that
anyhow. So since I have to subclass anyway, it sounds like there really
isn't a problem.

Next up: learning all the @Xml* annotations and trying not to fall asleep.
:-)

Best,
Laird

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Spell-out-generics-limitations-tp3561690p3562345.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.