On Apr 23, 2009, at 10:26 AM, James Strachan wrote:
>>> Contributions welcome :)
>>>
>>
>> It looks like they are willing to support the abstraction your
>> require. I am
>> not currently sure how this will work with some of the lift
>> features that
>> seem quite integrated with the templates. I remember scratching my
>> head
>> wondering how the snippet concept could be integrated with resource
>> classes.
>
> Yeah. Fingers crossed it works out OK - failing that we could always
> just fork the code and rip out the Ajax bits and just do a simple
> version of Lift's templates; thats compatible with the snippets stuff
> but doesn't include the whole thing. Though hopefully we can just
> reuse lift; plus then folks can always use 'real lift' and JAXRS side
> by side using the same codebase.
>
Yes. I know that another developer was using Jersey and lift side-by-
side but in their case Jersey was used to serve data (so the Jersey
filter was utilized).
>>
>> Is this this the start of a jersey-scala module ? :-)
>
> It could be :). When I've something more interesting than the previous
> bit of code I'll probably pop it up on github first; being neither a
> committer in Jersey or Lift - its then up to other folks to pull it
> into Jersey/Lift as they see fit.
If you like i can grant you the Developer role for Jersey. I think
given the patches you have submitted you clearly know what is going
on :-)
>
>
> Any plans to move Jersey to git BTW? :) It'd make contributing add ons
> much easier...
>
Tempting. I have considered moving over to Kenai.com and then we could
get git or hg support, but am concerned about the disruption this
might cause e.g. does NetBeans support git?
Paul.
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>