users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Jersey on app engine

From: Tatu Saloranta <tsaloranta_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:49:48 -0700

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
...
>>> XMLBeans? JiBX?
>>
>> Most data binding frameworks will probably have issues, due to
>> security limitations or missing classes. It's not so much the security
>> manager policies (which I understand -- and accept as a price of
>> otherwise really neat option for deployment) but rather missing
>> classes, and related problems that get you.
>>
>
> +1 Well put.

One observation/question regarding the white list: Stax API seems to
be missing. If so, wouldn't this meant that you could not use Stax
parsers on anything -- since API classes are not whitelisted, trying
to add api jar and load classes should fail?

If this is the case, it'd be another indication that what you get is
not really 1.6, but some arbitrary subset, perhaps just based on which
packages developers doing it happened to be aware of.

-+ Tatu +-