On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Gili wrote:
> Paul Sandoz (via Nabble) wrote:
> > In such cases i think the best solution is to provide a wrapping
> class
> > that implements ClientResponse thats performs buffering.
>
> Okay, fair enough. Initially I didn't understand that the
> wrapper would
> implement ClientResponse as well. So long as we can hide this behind
> the
> same interface I think we are in good shape. Should I open an issue to
> track this RFE?
>
Yes, please, thanks!
Paul.