users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Simplifying Jersey life-cycle and IoC integration

From: Gili <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:39 -0800 (PST)

Paul Sandoz (via Nabble) wrote:
> > Actually I would suggest breaking the method up into two:
> >
> > Class<?> getInjectableClass(Object original);
>
> What would the Jersey runtime do with that method?

        Ugh. You're totally right. On second thought, the Spring implementation
is all I need. Guice just doesn't expose a method for me to get at the
underlying instance but I'll try to hack a way to do so myself. Sorry
for the confusion ;)

        BTW, you did a really great job redesigning the IoC classes! It pretty
much resolved all the problems I had with the old design.

Gili

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Simplifying-Jersey-life-cycle-and-IoC-integration-tp1367641p1572746.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.