Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
>> Nope, the manual configuration is still required. Though
>> MultiPartBeanProvider no longer exists... Am I supposed to use
>> MultipartFormDispatchProvider instead?
>>
> I should have noticed this earlier ... sorry.
>
> MultiPartBeanProvider only (and still) exists in the unit tests for
> jersey-multipart. It's not part of the actual API like the other three
> classes are.
>
Okay. Should I still bother including MultipartFormDispatchProvider?
Gili
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Hello-World%21-and-Welcome-to-jersey-multipart-tp1343189p1560705.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.