Lars Tackmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grotzke
> --
> @PerRequest
> @Component
> @Scope( "prototype" )
> --
>
> I can understand the component part, but having to use springs @Scope
> annotation is overkill (at least when one also uses Jersey's lifecycle
> annotations).
>
I agree, but i am not sure what we can do about it. You can remove the
@PerRequest if you wish as that is the default life-cycle but still...
Also it is easy to create conflicts:
@Singleton
@Component
@Scope("prototype")
But it should be up to the Jersey spring component provider to detect that.
> Anyway thanks for the help. I suspect I will have a complete mavenised
> Spring/Jersey sample ready in a couple of days (integrated with Spring
> security 2) - I will gladly post it here, so others can benefit from
> it
>(perhaps it can go into jersey's example folder).
>
Please do! that would be a great contribution.
Paul.
--
| ? + ? = To question
----------------\
Paul Sandoz
x38109
+33-4-76188109