users@jersey.java.net

Re: [Jersey] Link to maven source code regarding version ranges

From: Martin Grotzke <martin.grotzke_at_freiheit.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:58:10 +0200

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:32 +0200, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:02:15PM +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 05:23 -0700, Chris Wilkes wrote:
> > > Martin asked for some documentation on the use of [2.5.2,) version
> > > ranges in maven here:
> > > https://jersey.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=1615
> > > (I've deleted the email and so can't easily respond to it, it would be
> > > nice if the web interface for the mailing list allowed replies).
> > >
> > > After spending quite a bit of time on the maven site I couldn't find
> > > anything about it so I went to the source:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.9/maven-artifact/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/versioning/VersionRange.java?view=markup
> > >
> > > and it describes how <version/> is parsed:
> > >
> > > 1.0 Version 1.0
> > > [1.0,2.0 Versions 1.0 (included) to 2.0 (not included)
> > > [1.0,2.0] Versions 1.0 to 2.0 (both included)
> > > [1.5,) Versions 1.5 and higher
> > > (,1.0],[1.2,) Versions up to 1.0 (included) and 1.2 or higher
> > Great research!
> >
> > IMHO we can change the spring25-release-version in the jersey-spring
> > pom.xml to [2.5.2,).
> >
> > Has anybody concerns regarding this?
>
> No concerns at all. As long as tests pass ;-)
>
> >
> > I'm off for holiday until monday, so I could change this on tuesday, so
> > that it's in the maven repo next wednseday - or somebody else is going
> > to change this...
>
> I can do it after the 0.8 release tomorow.
Ok, great!

Cheers,
Martin


> I do not want change things
> at the last moment right before the release (just in case something gets wrong).
>
> ~Jakub
>
> >
> > >
> > > I also noticed the the large spring.jar is included in jersey-spring's
> > > pom ("<artifactId>spring</artifactId>") which is a little weird as the
> > > spring-core and spring-webmvc artifacts are explicitly called out.
> > Hum, you say it's enough to have a dependency on spring-core and
> > spring-webmvc? (Right now unfortunately I have not the time to test this
> > by myself, sorry)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> >
>
>