On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 15:56 +0200, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Paul Sandoz wrote:
> >>> While integrating i realized that the abstract class
> >>> AnnotationInjectable is not really required. One can just use
> >>> Injectable and implement the method Injectable.getInjectableValue.
> >>> Furthermore we don't limit the field type to object and could say
> >>> support <? extends SomeClass>.
> >> You're right, this clarifies and simplifies things.
> >>
> >
> > OK. I will do that.
> >
>
> Done.
>
> Paul.
>
> > Do you want to commit the contrib/spring to the trunk after i have done
> > that?
Ok, I'll merge jersey-spring these days.
Cheers,
Martin
> >
> > Paul.
> >