From: Martin Grotzke <martin.grotzke_at_freiheit.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:00:49 +0200

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:07 +0200, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tidied up some of the JavaDoc and code formating.
>
> While integrating i realized that the abstract class
> AnnotationInjectable is not really required. One can just use Injectable
> and implement the method Injectable.getInjectableValue. Furthermore we
> don't limit the field type to object and could say support <? extends
> SomeClass>.
You're right, this clarifies and simplifies things.

Cheers,
Martin


> I propose that we remove it from the trunk and just support Injectable
> for such purposes.
>
> Paul.