Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_Sun.COM> wrote:
> Would it be better to define an AbstractServletAdapter that can be
> extended? since there are some subtle issues around supporting thread
> local stuff that can be implemented by AbstractServletAdapter.
That would be fantastic!
>> Also, I noticed WebApplicationImpl contains the method public void
>> register(Set<Class> resourceClasses). Will that eventually make it
into
>> the WebApplication SPI?
> We can do that. I also think it worthwhile putting a default
ResourceConfig implementation in the API.
> We are planning to change ResourceConfig so that as well as features
> one
> can add properties to this, this could be a way to pass in the instance
> of a particular ResourceProviderFactory to the RootResourceClass using
an agreed property name.
Excellent!
> Paul
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.