Daniel Manzke wrote:
> Hey,
>
> this is the thing I've waited for. ;) So go on and if you need help, I
> will try to help you where I can. I asked Stefan Tilkov for this feature
> long time ago, where he was in berlin.
> I'm glad to see other people also need this. :)
>
>
> @Julian:
> What do you mean with bindings to JSR 283? Do you really think that they
> will complete it? :)
I mean a WebDAV implementation that uses the JCR API for storage.
And yes, I do except "them" to finish it, given the fact that I'm a
member of that Expert Group, and we're really in the process of closing
the last issues.
And again, yes, there's currently lots of talk about CMIS, but this
group of people (which I joined too) still have to prove that their
approach is any better than the one used in the JCR expert group.
So, rephrasing this into a question instead: would that WebDAV
implementation be targeted to a specific storage API (like file system +
property files), or would it use a generic API such as JCR? (Or both?)
BR, Julian