Hi -
Unfortunately, I can't sign the SCA because of restrictions here at
Wells Fargo :(
To answer your question, I need to move classes around after they were
created using _class because in my case I really can't use bindings.
You see, because of regulations in the bank, we're required to put EVERY
SOAP method in its own namespace with it's own XSD file (we have over
40+ XSD files). So, it's really unfeasible to create a bindings file
with over 40+ global bindings to place the domain objects and messages
in the proper package structure, but it's easy to do programmatically in
a custom pluggin.
Speaking of bindings file, I've been trying to use SCD and <xjc:simple
/> to eliminate all occurrences of JAXBElement in the generated classes
with no luck. Here's my binding:
<jxb:bindings version="2.0"
xmlns:jxb="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
xmlns:xs="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xjc="
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb/xjc"
xmlns:cvcommon="
http://service.wellsfargo.com/provider/cashVault/profile
/common"
jxb:extensionBindingPrefixes="xjc">
<jxb:bindings scd="/*::cvcommon:*">
<jxb:globalBindings>
<xjc:simple />
</jxb:globalBindings>
</jxb:bindings>
</jxb:bindings>
But when I generate the classes, I still get JAXBElement everywhere.
Any suggestions?
Julio A. Mistral
Cash Vault Systems
415.243.6087
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi [mailto:Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 03:18 PM
To: dev_at_jaxb2-commons.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: Re-Post: Finer grained controll over the code model.
Julio.A.Mistral_at_wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to XJC plugin development and so I'm unsure about what I've
been
> doing is the correct way to go. Basically, I've been adding the
> following methods to sun.codemodel classes to have finer control over
> the generated classes:
>
> JPackage
> 1. public void add( JDefinedClass class ): Adds the provided class
to
> the package
You are supposed to create JDefinedClass by calling JPackage._class.
Why do you want to move it around after it's created?
> 3. public JMethod removeMethod(String name, JType[] params): Removes
> the method from the classes method list and returns a reference of the
> removed method, or null if the method doesn't exist.
This I think we can add. Would you be interested in signing SCA and
sending us the patch?
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com