Its not hard to get around it, I wanted to know if there was a way to do it
without a workaround.
I opened an issue (#737) since this is obviously a bug.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Joshua Royalty <royalpeasantry_at_gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Just demonstrating, my case is more complicated than this so I simplified
>> it.
>>
>> So you'll get an answer for the simplified case:
>
> If you use
> <xjc:javaType adapter="foo.ListAdapter" name="foo.ListOfString" />
>
> with ListOfString.java like this:
>
> package foo;
> import java.util.*;
> public class ListOfString extends ArrayList<String> {
> public ListOfString( Collection<String> c ){
> super( c );
> }
> public ListOfString(){
> super();
> }
> }
>
> you compile with full type checking. Notice that you can use e.g.
>
> ListOfString los = new ListOfString();
> doc.setItems( los );
> los.add( "one" );
> los.add( "two" );
> for( String s: doc.getItems() ){
> System.out.println( s );
> }
>
> so all the wrapper has to do is map the constructors, as you need them.
>
>
> Given that I am using the maven-jaxb2-plugin.. does anyone know how to
>> figure out what version of jaxb I am using?
>>
>>
> Look at the line 2 of the generated Java source:
>
> // This file was generated by the JavaTM Architecture for XML Binding(JAXB)
> Reference Implementation, XXX
>
> XXX is not always JAXB 2.y.x, but one can figure out the xjc version from
> s.th. like vhudson-jaxb-ri-... as well.
>
> -W
>
>
>
>> Thank You,
>> -Josh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Are you trying to create a binding for a list of String values to a
>>> simple xs:element value, or are you just demonstrating xjc's (non)handling
>>> of generics?
>>>
>>> For the former, see
>>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/tutorial/section_2_2_8-Defining-Other-Lists.html#Defining%20Other%20Listswhere you'll see that using xs:list solves the problem nicely.
>>>
>>> -W
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Joshua Royalty <
>>> joshua.royalty_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ####### Schema #########
>>>>
>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>>>> <xs:schema
>>>> elementFormDefault="qualified"
>>>> targetNamespace="http://test"
>>>> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>>>> xmlns="http://test"
>>>> >
>>>> <xs:element name="root" type="rootType" />
>>>>
>>>> <xs:complexType name="rootType">
>>>> <xs:sequence>
>>>> <xs:element name="items" type="xs:string"/>
>>>> </xs:sequence>
>>>> </xs:complexType>
>>>>
>>>> </xs:schema>
>>>>
>>>> ######## Bindings File #############
>>>>
>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>> <bindings version="2.1"
>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
>>>> xmlns:xjc="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb/xjc"
>>>> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
>>>> >
>>>> <bindings schemaLocation="test.xsd" node="/xs:schema">
>>>> <bindings node="//xs:complexType[@name='rootType']">
>>>> <bindings node="//xs:element[@name='items']">
>>>> <property>
>>>> <baseType>
>>>> <xjc:javaType adapter="ListAdapter"
>>>> name="java.util.List<String>" />
>>>> </baseType>
>>>> </property>
>>>> </bindings>
>>>> </bindings>
>>>> </bindings>
>>>> </bindings>
>>>>
>>>> ###### Output #####
>>>>
>>>> import java.util.List<String>; <--- Problem
>>>> import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessType;
>>>> import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessorType;
>>>> import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement;
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>> public class RootType {
>>>>
>>>> @XmlElement(required = true, type = String.class)
>>>> @XmlJavaTypeAdapter(ListAdapter.class)
>>>> protected List<String>items;
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So.. The problem is pretty obvious, when XJC adds the import for the
>>>> external type it doesn't remove the generic part. If I switch to
>>>>
>>>> <xjc:javaType adapter="ListAdapter" name="java.util.List" />
>>>>
>>>> it compiles, but has raw type warnings.
>>>>
>>>> This is even a rather trivial example since String is imported by
>>>> default. What about java.util.List<java.util.Map<String,
>>>> java.utli.Map<java.util.Set, java.util.List<String>>>> or similar?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So... am I missing something? Its similar to
>>>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=234 .. but not quite,
>>>> this is a bit more basic than that.
>>>>
>>>> I am using the maven-jaxb2-plugin
>>>> <groupId>org.jvnet.jaxb2.maven2</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>maven-jaxb2-plugin</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> Thank You,
>>>> -Josh
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>