This is in the specification for JAXB. Look for "Java Mapping for XML
Schema Built-in Types".
Thank you
Ted Poovey
Software Engineer III
I.T. Application Management
U.S. Central
9701 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(ph) 913-227-6106
(fax) 913-227-6254
-----Original Message-----
From: Shahar Valdman [mailto:Shahar.Valdman_at_modelity.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:24 AM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: RE: RE: RE: how to create objects instead of primitives
Thanks. I have come across the same issue with the boolean type (jaxb
creates boolean whilst I'm interested in Boolean).
Is there any way to indicated jaxb to create Boolean? Is there any
documentation where I may check this stuff out myself and not bother
everybody?
Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Poovey [mailto:tpoovey_at_uscentral.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:35 PM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: RE: RE: RE: how to create objects instead of primitives
Yes, use xsd:integer as your datatype in xsd
Thank you
Ted Poovey
Software Engineer III
I.T. Application Management
U.S. Central
9701 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(ph) 913-227-6106
(fax) 913-227-6254
-----Original Message-----
From: Shahar Valdman [mailto:Shahar.Valdman_at_modelity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:26 AM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: RE: RE: how to create objects instead of primitives
Thanks!
Actually, it's a good solution for me (I did not know JAXB will create
a BigDecimal). Is there a similar solution for integer/positiveInteger
schema objects?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Poovey [mailto:tpoovey_at_uscentral.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:04 PM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: RE: RE: how to create objects instead of primitives
Is there a reason you are not using decimal instead of double?
Thank you
Ted Poovey
Software Engineer III
I.T. Application Management
U.S. Central
9701 Renner Blvd
Lenexa, KS 66219
(ph) 913-227-6106
(fax) 913-227-6254
-----Original Message-----
From: Shahar Valdman [mailto:Shahar.Valdman_at_modelity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:45 AM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: RE: how to create objects instead of primitives
a type for example from my schema:
<xs:complexType name="T2">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="T1">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="myName"
type="xs:double"></xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
The generated class: (I would like myName to be of type Double)
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
@XmlType(name = "T2", propOrder = {
" myName "
})
public class T2 extends T1{
protected double myName;
public double getMyName () {
return myName;
}
public void setMyName (double value) {
this. myName = value;
}
public boolean isSetMyName () {
return true;
}
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Felipe Gaścho [mailto:fgaucho_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:37 AM
To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: how to create objects instead of primitives
ok, please send us a fragment of your schema.. an example of element
and what types you want in the java class....
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Shahar Valdman
<Shahar.Valdman_at_modelity.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the rapid reply, but I have searched through the
customization guide and could not find such an option.
> I noticed choice attributes lead to similar results, but my schema
does not have choices for these cases.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Gaścho [mailto:fgaucho_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: how to create objects instead of primitives
>
> use customizations:
>
http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/1.5/tutorial/doc/JAXBUsing4.html
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Shahar Valdman
> <Shahar.Valdman_at_modelity.com> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am having an issue with instructing JAXB to generate java classes
without
>> using primitives (I would like jaxb not to create double, but
Double etc). I
>> noticed it's possible to set parse and print methods for those
primitives,
>> but it leads to undesirable results, involving adapters..
>>
>> Is that somehow possible to inform JAXB not to use primitives?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Shahar.valdman_at_modelity.com
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net