Paul Hussein wrote:
> Thanks for the hint!
>
> Is this still a feature then in jaxb2 as in jaxb1 that if the
> enumeration is large then the code generated will be too large, and
> the only way round is as below, or is there some other way ?
I think this is a bug in the spec. The spec doesn't define a cut-off
point, so we can't just do that in the RI.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com