I also have posted a new snapshot with the 20061109 build. Big
improvement, around 25% quicker.
Eric Crampton wrote:
> Hi Kohsuke,
>
> I've put a new attachment on that issue using the 20061109 build.
> Looks like it's about 1700 ms versus 4000 ms from before, so this
> looks to be a huge improvement. Looks like you removed the reflection
> work that was being done from before---excellent!
>
> (I would've written this comment in the issue tracker, but either I
> don't have permission to write comments, or it's too early in the
> morning for me to figure out how.)
>
> --Eric
>
> On 11/8/06, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_sun.com> wrote:
>> Eric Crampton wrote:
>> > Hi Kohsuke and Kenny,
>> >
>> > I profiled my stuff as well and got the same results as
>> > Kenny---roughly the same performance numbers and same hot spots. The
>> > wallclock time to run JAXBContext.newInstance was roughly the same
>> > using the old and new, with and without the fastboot property being
>> > set.
>> >
>> > I've posted the two Netbeans profiler outputs here:
>> >
>> > http://www.eonomine.com/jaxbperf.nps (original one from before
>> > using ri-20060426)
>> > http://www.eonomine.com/jaxbperf-fastboot.nps (using ri-20061108 with
>> > fastBoot=true)
>> >
>> > Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help out!
>>
>> Thanks. Snapshot much appreciated. I opened issue #275 [1] to keep track
>> of this, so it would be great if you can post snapshots as attachments
>> in this issue.
>>
>> I looked at the code again and fixed one "D'oh!" bug. So if you can try
>> today's nightly, that would be great.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=275
>> --
>> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>> Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>