Johnny Tolliver wrote:
> Don't mind sharing it. It's attached, though I doubt you can attempt to
> compile it without the entire 33 MB tree. Is there anything else you could
> use to analyze this problem?
Yes. I need to see the definition of sml:AbstractProcessType
> I'm using the JAXB 2.0 that's in JWSDP 2.0. Should I get one of the newer
> releases?
Yes! Definitely please use JAXB 2.0.3 or 2.1 EAs.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com