IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
error (Rails)) .
I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
> com.sun -- but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for
> Sun internal; whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
>
> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would
> be if there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net
> <http://java.net> archive; instead of maintaining seperate copies...?
> Or for whatever process delivers it to java.net <http://java.net> to
> deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
>
> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
>
>
> Malachi
>
>
> On 8/11/06, *Franz Fehringer* <feh_at_isogmbh.de <mailto:feh_at_isogmbh.de>>
> wrote:
>
> Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> sent by Joerg.Schaible_at_Elsag-Solutions.com
> <mailto:Joerg.Schaible_at_Elsag-Solutions.com> in mind saying
> .
> .
> .
>
> Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> <http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry>
> .
> .
> .
>
> Hosting at java.net <http://java.net> is not appropriate for me,
> because i sit behind a
> proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
> first
> proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> sites with maven2.
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
> Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
> per the
> > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> > ibilio -- I
> > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net
> <http://java.net>?
> >
> > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> > Databinding?
> >
> > Malachi
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh_at_isogmbh.de
> <mailto:feh_at_isogmbh.de>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
> Maven2?
> >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api
> jaxb-impl
> >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
> there
> >> are
> >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> >>
> >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> >>
> >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> >>
> >> Thanks and best regards
> >>
> >> Franz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net>
>
>
>