Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
sent by Joerg.Schaible_at_Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
.
.
.
Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and "com.sun.xml" only. See also
http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
.
.
.
Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first
proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
sites with maven2.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
> We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the
> website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> ibilio -- I
> thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
>
> Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> Databinding?
>
> Malachi
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <feh_at_isogmbh.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
>> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
>> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
>> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
>> are
>> several things wrong/missing with this:
>>
>> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
>> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
>> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>>
>> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>>
>> Thanks and best regards
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>