Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> I have no problem in using the Ant task in general -- I just really don't
> want to be building up any classpaths, filesets, etc in my configuration.
I can guarantee that you'll never ever write <classpath> in Maven, even
with my proposed reuse of the Ant syntax.
Even if we were to reuse the Ant syntax, I agree that we want a
Maven-only syntax for loading extensions into XJC.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com