Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> 2) the .xjb bindings... don't they have to be associated with specific
> schemas? ie: wouldn't a HashMap work better than ArrayList?
No, they don't. A list is suffice, actually.
> 4) what about strict/-nv?
> FYI: I think a good thing to do is just make sure that we cover every
> option a user would get from typing 'xjc' on the command line
(the reason I'm suggesting to reuse the Ant syntax is so that we get the
coverage for free, as you know.)
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com