users@jaxb.java.net

Re: No concrete java class generated for a global element that references a global type

From: Dmitri Colebatch <dim_at_colebatch.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:29:25 +1100

Hi Ed,

Delayed response I know... of course I meant Mustang, I must be
getting old and failing to keep up with the names (o:

cheers
dim

On 31/01/06, Ed Mooney <Ed.Mooney_at_sun.com> wrote:
> Hi Dim,
>
> JSRs 222 (JAXB 2.0) and 224 (JAX-WS 2.0) are going into Mustang[1]. The
> JAX-WS data binding facilities are built on JAXB, but I don't know what
> differences there will be, if any, between the beans/xsd they'd generate
> vs. what you'd get from the bundled xjc/schemagen. See the articles at
> [1], particularly this one[2].
>
> -- Ed
>
> [1] https://mustang.dev.java.net/
> [2] http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jitu/archive/2006/01/web_service_end.html
>
> Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > Thanks Ed - I'll give it a go. One of these such schems is the SOAP
> > 1.2 schema which we have unfortunately already had to tweak to make it
> > play happily with JAXB.
> >
> > On another note - I believe that the JAXB RI, along with generated
> > SOAP schemas, are bundled with Tiger. Do you know what the
> > implications of this are on situations like this, where I want to
> > generate my own JAXB classes for the SOAP schemas?
> >
> > thanks,
> > dim
> >
> [ ... ]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>