users@jaxb.java.net

Re: does the RI installer invoke a jvm with "java"?

From: jonathan gold <dev_at_samizdatdigital.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:08:10 -0700

no problem. i probably wasn't clear, but i was invoking java with a full
path, ie running '$JAVA_HOME/bin/java -jar ...' from the shell. in any
event, it sounds like things are under control:)

jon

Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
> jonathan gold wrote:
>
>> the java in /usr/bin/ is in fact 1.4.2_05 (standard apple port of
>> hotspot), so this made sense. i confirmed the same on my linux machine
>> -- the installer seemed to invoke /usr/bin/java, which doesn't work.
>
>
> The installer is just a jar file, so which JVM is used to run it
> entirely depends on the way your OS set up. I don't have a Mac so I
> don't know how it works, but for example in Windows it runs a java
> associated with '.jar' extension, which tends to be the last JDK/JRE
> installed.
>
> Of course if you just run "java -jar ..." then it depends on your PATH.
>
>> not sure how the installer works, but if there's an exec of
>> "/usr/bin/java", or if it allows the shell to pick the "best" java
>> from the user's $PATH, i think that might be worth a look. maybe try
>> to use $JAVA_HOME/bin/java first, if that variable is set?
>
>
> When you run xjc.sh or schemagen.sh, it tries to run $JAVA_HOME/bin/java
> if $JAVA_HOME is set, otherwise I think it just runs "java". So again it
> depends on your environment. You can see this process by running:
>
> $ sh -x xjc.sh ..
>
> I don't know if it's possible for a shell script to check for multiple
> java executables in your PATH and pick the right one. It seems to be too
> complicated, although I could be wrong.
>
>> incidentally, i got the installer to run by creating a fake
>> /usr/bin/java that symlinked to my $JAVA_HOME/bin/java, and then
>> fixing the link after the installer ran. couldn't have done that if i
>> didn't have sudo though...
>>
>> i tried a couple of queries on issue tracker, but everything came back
>> with no results (i'm still a bit bewildered by those types of query
>> forms:), so my apologies if this is a dup.
>
>
> Thanks for checking the archive first!
>