Do you really need all generated objects to be java serializable?
You could implement some top level java-serializable object that would
xml-serialize generated objects into string, and then send that string
into ObjectOutputStream.
The added benefit to this approach is looser coupling: wire contract
(plus versioning, etc) will be defined by shape of xml document.
Thanks
-gia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:colebatchd_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:59 PM
> To: users_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> Subject: xjc: how to make a class implement Serialiazable
> without changing the schema?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to use xjc to generate java classes for 3rd party
> schemas - as such I don't have control over the schemas and
> would like to avoid having to xslt them in order to have the
> generated classes implement Serializable.
>
> Is it possible to direct xjc to make all generated classes
> implement the Serializable interface without changing the schemas?
>
> cheers
> dim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>
>
_______________
Siebel
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER
Visit www.siebel.com
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains confidential and/or privileged information belonging to Siebel Systems, Inc. or its customers or partners. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all soft and hard copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation.