Hi.
> Thanks for reply.
>
> The document of GML 2.1.2 specifications mentions that all examples
> (city.xsd) have been validated using the following suite of parsers:
> · Apache Xerces (v2.0 beta 4)
> · Altova XML Spy (v4.2)
> · Microsoft MSXML (v4.0)
> And the schema feature.xsd and geometry.xsd are parsed by XAmple (using
> Xerces).
>
>
> For you, these schemas contain errors ?
> Do you know if the GML 3.0 schemas could pose less problem ?
Few weeks ago I managed to compile both 2.1.2 and 3.0 GML schemas with
JAXB. The only thing I remember right now is that I needed quite a lot
of customizations because of the class name issues (like the one you
mention in your mail).
In any case, GML is compileable.
Finally, since we needed GML schemas only for compatibility, we've
migrated to a relatively small subset of GML (that's why I can't assist
you with the binding file/further instructions anymore).
Maybe if I have time I'll deploy a test scenario for GML 3.0 with HyperJAXB.
Bye.
/lexi