Shashi Garje <SGarje_at_cccis.com> wrote:
> The name of the field that it was expecting and the name of the field that
> it actually found would be useful.
Would you elaborate on how do you use it? Is it just for your debugging
aid? It seems to me that names of fields are not something you'd want to
present to users.
I agree that it's better than nothing, but it's probably a lot of effort
to do this, and we don't want to find out that it's not that much useful
after we spend a lot of time in it.
regards,
--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI 408-276-7063 (x17063)
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com