> A non-default switch. For example, if you wanted
> to support XML Schema concepts whose binding was not
> yet specified, your implementation could with a non-default
> switch. The JAXB RI has such a switch and it is
> called "-extension".
Thanks for the clarification.
> However, could you provide a good use case on why it
> is important to map xs:QNames to a Java typesafe enum class?
I do not see the use case that forces the possibility. I just
see that if I already have the possibility of the typesafe
enum, then it costs me about 10 lines of code to provide the
same for xs:qname, xs:duration and most other stuff. (Timezone
related values are a different matter, but unfortunately I
have read the relevant part of the specification too late
and the typesafe enumerations for xs:dateTime and so on
are already implemented ... :-)
Regards,
Jochen