Hi.
> The changes for issue 64 looks good to me (besides the following one
> small bug),
Would you mind correcting it?
> but because the branch contains fixes for both 64 and 62,
> and because I have a compatibility concern about issue 62, I cannot
> merge this branch into the trunk right away.
> My only concern is the compatibility. I believe we cannot generate
> public methods that are not in the spec.
Maybe I'm wrong, but the spec just says typesafe enums should be
implemented as [BLOCH]. Which is quite vague. I think typesafe enum
interface is not define in the spec. Am I wrong here?
> Would it be possible to do issue 62 as a plugin?
Well, yes, but it would be a bit ugly.
Let me know about you decision.
Bye.
/lexi