and, there is that war REST x SOPA out there :)
On 2/8/07, Richard Hallier <richard.hallier_at_freesbee.fr> wrote:
>
> I'm coming to short list xfire & jax-ws 2.1 ri, both very easy and fast.
> The
> difference could be just a matter of standards...
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Henri Gomez [mailto:henri.gomez_at_gmail.com]
> > Envoyé : jeudi 8 février 2007 14:14
> > À : users_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> > Objet : Re: Jboss & jax-ws
> >
> > Well I tried latest jbossws and xfire, and I retain JAX-WS
> > 2.1 since it was very easy to use, implement well JSR181 and
> > JAXB2 support (of course).
> >
> > And the RI 2.1 is also really fast....
> >
> > So if you want to keep with Web Services specs, JAX-WS RI is
> > probably the best candidate
> >
> > 2007/2/8, Levi Purvis <javanet_at_purvis.ws>:
> > > Yes, I'm doing that.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/7/07, Richard Hallier <richard.hallier_at_freesbee.fr> wrote:
> > > > Evaluating several soap stacks, I'd like to know if it's
> > possible to
> > > > use jax-ws 2.1 RI instead of Jboss-ws1 inside a Jboss 4
> > AS ? That RI
> > > > seems pretty stable and functional.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > R
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>
>