users@jax-ws.java.net

Re: _at_WebService and targetNamespace weirdness

From: Doug Kohlert <Doug.Kohlert_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:27:58 -0800

Rama is correct, sounds like the docs are wrong and need to be updated.

Rama Pulavarthi wrote:
> Yes, the behavior is correct.
> If you have SEI, then the implementation class can only have
> @WebService, @BindingType, @HandlerChain annotations.
> If you want them in the same wsdl, either put them in the same package
> and not specify the targetNamespace in @WebService or specify the same
> ns at both the places.
>
> thanks,
> Rama Pulavarthi
>
> Mohan K R wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> I am using the 2.1-SNAPSHOT (> 2.1-EA3) of JAX-WS. My WS is split
>> into the interface and an implementation task.
>> Now as per the docs for "endpointInterface" attribute for @WebService
>> annotation: (emphasis mine)
>>
>> The qualified name of the service endpoint interface. This annotation
>> allows the separation of interface contract from implementation. If
>> this property is specified, **all other WebService properties are
>> ignored as are all other 181 annotations**. Only the annotations on
>> the service endpoint interface will be taken into consideration. The
>> endpoint implementation class is not required to implement the
>> endpointInterface.
>>
>> So, I put all my JSR181 annotation on my Interface (including
>> targetNamespace). And only thing on my implementation class was the
>> @WebService annotation with the "endpointInterface" attribute. Now,
>> when I look at the generated WSDL,
>> it is split into 2 files (2 more for the types), with an import of
>> the second wsdl file with my annotated targetNamespace. But the
>> original WSDL contains a "generated" targetNamespace of the
>> implementation class package. Why is that?
>>
>> Strangely, contradicting the doc's above, if I put in the same
>> "targetNamespace" attribute *again* in my implementation class
>> (same value as in the Interface class), the generated WSDL does not
>> get split and I get the behavior that I want.
>>
>> So, now to my question, is this how I am supposed to do this? Or, is
>> this a bug in the docs or implementation?
>>
>> Thanks
>> MK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>