dev@jax-ws.java.net

Re: InstanceResolver changes

From: Jitendra Kotamraju <Jitendra.Kotamraju_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:34:04 -0700

Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> Jitu,
>
> how should I change the code?
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> final QName serviceName =
> WSEndpoint.getDefaultServiceName(ServiceChannelWSImpl.class);
> final QName portName =
> WSEndpoint.getDefaultPortName(serviceName, ServiceChannelWSImpl.class);
> final BindingID bindingId =
> BindingID.parse(ServiceChannelWSImpl.class);
> final WSBinding binding = bindingId.createBinding();
> return WSEndpoint.create(
> ServiceChannelWSImpl.class, true,
> (*)
> InstanceResolver.createSingleton(ServiceChannelWSImpl.class.newInstance()).createInvoker(),
>
In this case, just pass null.

Jitu
> serviceName, portName, null, binding,
> null, null, (EntityResolver) null, true
> );
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Jitendra Kotamraju wrote:
>> I plan to remove InstanceResolver.createInvoker() due to security
>> concerns. WSEndpoint.create() allows null Invoker so shouldn't affect
>> your impls that use hosting SPI. If you have concerns, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jitu
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>