dev@jax-ws.java.net

Re: deployment bug?

From: Jitendra Kotamraju <Jitendra.Kotamraju_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:17:58 -0700

Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East wrote:

> Vijay Ramachandran wrote:
>
>> Ryan,
>>
>> How does the @WebService annotation look ? Is there a wsdlLocation
>> attribute that points to the wsdl location correctly.
>>
>
> I have:
>
> @WebService(serviceName="Coordinator",
> portName="ActivationCoordinator",
> endpointInterface =
> "com.sun.org.xmlsoap.ws.coord.ActivationCoordinatorPortType",
> targetNamespace =
> "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/10/wscoor",
> wsdlLocation = "WEB-INF/wsdl/wscoor.wsdl")
> public class ActivationCoordinatorPortTypeImpl implements
> ActivationCoordinatorPortType {...}
>
> and then my war has the wsdl under WEB-INF/wsdl/wscoor.wsdl.
>
> FWIW, Bobby suggested putting a copy of the ws-addressing xml types in my
> war file and edit my wsdl to point to it and that worked fine.
>
>> This exception is caused because in the JavaEE environment, you cannot
>> get access to your local file system. If you are packaging WSDL, then it
>> should be in your WAR/JAR and the location in the WAR/JAR relative to
>> the root of the module should be specified in the wsdlLocation
>> attribute.
>>
>
> I think that's exactly what I'm doing. However:
>
> When my wsdl has this:
>
> <wsdl:types>
> <xs:schema>
> <xs:import
>
> namespace='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing'
>
> schemaLocation='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing'/>
> </>
> </>
>
> I get the exception:
>
> file:/D:/gf-v2b17/domains/domain1/applications/j2ee-modules/wstx-services/WEB-INF/wsdl/http:/schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing
>
>
> It looks like the system is looking for the addressing file relative to
> my wsdlLocation, which seems like a bug to me.
>
> If I place a copy of addressing.xml in WEB-INF/wsdl and change
> wscoor.wsdl to:
>
> <wsdl:types>
> <xs:schema>
> <xs:import
>
> namespace='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing'
> schemaLocation='addressing.xml'/>
> </>
> </>
>
> it works fine.
>
> I'd rather not bundle the address types.

That should be the case, you shouldn't have to bundle address types.

While resolving, we use relative url mechanism of JDK. new URL(fileUrl,
"http://schemas...") should give http:// URL. Need to verify this is the
case in glassfish deployment.

Jitu

>
> Thanks,
>
> --Ryan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>