Hi Paul,
some time ago, we even discussed possibility of having
policy assertions accesible not only via [WSDLPolicyMapWrapper]
(which implements [WSDLExtension] and gets attached to [WSDLModel])
by attaching them directly to their appropriate wsdl elements.
Such approach would IMO perfeclty fit what you mentioned bellow.
What do you think?
~Jakub
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:40:32PM +0200, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rather than having specific methods on [1] for features like MTOM,
> addressing, FI, and having to add more methods as more features are
> added (e.g. anybody for JSON???), we should have something more generic.
>
> There is something already in place called WSDLExtension, but it is not
> clear to me if this is explicitly designed for element/attribute
> extensions or can be used as a generic mechanism.
>
> Can WSDLExtension be used generically for things based on policy
> assertions? If so i would like to modify WSDLBoundPortType to support
> MTOM/addressing and FI using this mechanism.
>
> Such extensions can be specified as part of the JAX-WS API and the
> policy tool can add these extensions as required.
>
> Paul.
>
> [1]
> http://fisheye5.cenqua.com/browse/jax-ws-sources/jaxws-ri/rt/src/com/sun/xml/ws/api/model/wsdl/WSDLBoundPortType.java?r=1.1.2.12.2.1
>
> --
> | ? + ? = To question
> ----------------\
> Paul Sandoz
> x38109
> +33-4-76188109
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jax-ws.dev.java.net
>