>> Yep, we discussed to use BindingType.features(String[]). In
>> retrospect, BindingType should have been designed to take multiple ids
>> but for backwards compatibility this cannot be changed.
> But doesnt BindingType.features suppose to have some wider purpose of
> use, not just like list of additional BindingIDs? In this case not all
> listed BindingType.features could be treated as BindingIDs... How JAXWS
> will distinct them?
>
> Arun, where in wsit BindingType.features will be used, just interesting
> to see what actual are usecases for it?
So far, the only standard features are ADDRESSING_FEATURE and MTOM_FEATURE.
I think we need to take the multiple proprietary binding ids approach as
discussed earlier in this thread and then use them instead of using
BindingType.features.
-Arun
--
Web Technologies and Standards
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Blog: http://blogs.sun.com/arungupta