Also ...
TExtensionHandler is an interface in "api" package. There is an
AbstractExtensionHandler which is not in the "api" package.
I expect WSDL parser extensions to extend from AbstractExtensionHandler
most of the times since they may like to handle extensiblity points
within certain WSDL elements only, not all. Can we move
AbstractExtensionHandler to "api" package as well ?
-Arun
Arun Gupta wrote:
> With TExtensionHandler checked into workspace, WSDLParserExtension is
> moot. Is that correct ?
>
> Also, can we rename TExtensionHandler to TWSDLParserExtensionHandler to
> be more meaningful ?
>
> Can we also rename JavaExtensionHandler to TJavaExtensionHandler to be
> consistent ?
>
> -Arun
--
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices