Hi
Though on a 2nd thought I wonder how feasible it is to have something
like @SseNotify realized without having
an SSEContext injected into the application class, with the application
service acting as a storage for this (thread local) SSEContext
which keeps the track of the open SSE channels. May be I'm missing
something :-)
Cheers, Sergey
On 03/02/17 09:53, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Il 03/02/2017 10:41, Sergey Beryozkin ha scritto:
>> I think the proposed SSE API should stay (to let users control SSE
>> flows in a fine grained manner when needed),
>>
>> However offering the users an option to cover the basic SSE flows
>> with the use of annotations is interesting which
>> if accepted should be complementary IMHO
> +1 , it could be a nice addition making it easier for users to try SEE.
>
> Cheers
> Alessio
>