> On Jan 15, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Pavel Bucek <pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
> I guess the second quiestion is almost reduced to the first one - do we really want to have CompletableFuture ALWAYS in the chain? (or to be more on point - do we want to create JaxRsCompletableFuture and use that as an "rx extension point"?)
This is the biggest issue with this proposal, it’s just delegation to CompletionStage, always. This is not the same as the RxInvoker proposal, in which other Rx library can be “natively” integrated.
This is a showstopper for me, so -1.
— Santiago