Java 10 ? JAX-RS 2.1 is Java 8 based, and RxJava is highly popular so
voluntarily restricting 2.1. to CompletableStage only would be a mistake...
Sergey
On 12/01/17 17:10, Markus KARG wrote:
>
> The question is whether we actually want the ability to support other
> reactive implementations, or whether we decide to stick with
> CompletableStage? The rx intermediate method makes the API more
> complex for anybody. On the other hand, Java 10 possibly will provide
> a "real" reactive API for everyone, and we cannot natively support it,
> but enforce people to use rx() still, which is tedious. I cannot
> remember that the EG actually agreed upon a final answer of this dilemma.
>
> *From:*Santiago Pericasgeertsen
> [mailto:santiago.pericasgeertsen_at_oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2017 16:00
> *To:* jsr370-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: [jax-rs-spec users] JAX-RS 2.1 - work schedule
>
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Pavel Bucek <pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> So what's going to happen next? We are currently working in PoC
> implementation of Reactive client API which is currently in the
> JAX-RS source repository master branch - it is almost ready for
> review. We identified small improvement needed there and I'm going
> to take care of that, finish the PoC implementation and document
> the API on the wiki. Once this is done, I'll send a request for
> review to this mailing list.
>
> Just a quick reminder that the crux of the RX work is the addition of
> new rx() methods to Invocation, with default support for
> CompletionStage and an extension point to plug in other reactive
> implementations via the RxInvoker type [1].
>
> — Santiago
>
> [1]
> https://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/sources/api/content/jaxrs-api/src/main/java/javax/ws/rs/client/Invocation.java
>