On 19/08/14 18:03, Markus KARG wrote:
> You can list me as a supporter for JAX-RS 2.1.
>
> May I use the anticipated list of targeted items from your PDF in public
> talks on JAX-RS's future?
I'd like to refer to them too.
>
> BTW, as you intend to target Java SE 8, it might me a good idea to add a
> mandatory item to that list: Supporting the new language features, in
> particular lambda expressions, streams API, and Consumers / Producers. Those
> are what people most commonly understand unter "8", so it would be a shame
> if we do not overhaul the API using that features.
>
Java 8 would be too early, same way as Java 7 was to early was Java 2.0.
We have users still on Java 1.5 due to the internal restrictions. Making
Java 7 a base stack for 2.1 would work IMHO.
Cheers, Sergey
> Regards
> Markus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen [mailto:Santiago.PericasGeertsen_at_oracle.com]
>
> Sent: Dienstag, 19. August 2014 16:30
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] JAX-RS 2.1 JSR
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> After collecting the feedback on this alias as well as that of the
> community (via the survey), we are ready to move forward with JAX-RS version
> 2.1. We decided to spin off the MVC work into a separate JSR, now called MVC
> 1.0. It is likely that MVC 1.0 will define integration points with JAX-RS,
> but it will be up to the MVC EG group to define those. In addition, MVC 1.0
> may support other types of controllers.
>
> In preparation for the JSR submission, I'd like to ask if I can list your
> name as a _supporter_ for JAX-RS 2.1 (Note that becoming a supporter is
> different from an EG member). If you want to be listed as a supporter,
> please respond to this message as soon as possible.
>
> Looking forward to working with you again. Thanks!
>
> -- Santiago
>
>
>