On 30/06/14 16:43, Bill Burke wrote:
> I will say this again:
>
> I am highly skeptical/violently opposed to defining an MVC framework
> inside of JAX-RS. If other specifications, like JSF, want tighter
> integration with JAX-RS, let them worry about it.
>
> On 6/29/2014 12:39 PM, Markus KARG wrote:
>> So my proposal would be, go with separated PDFs provided by a joint EG,
>> keeping JAX-RS clean of MVC, but allow frameworks like JSF to use the
>> technical core of JAX-RS if that is beneficial for them.
>>
>
> +1000. Keep MVC out of JAX-RS. I'm fine defining simple things like
> forwards and some way of transfering properties around. But, we should
> only be defining APIs/SPIs to make creating MVC frameworks possible, not
> implementing one ourselves in JAX-RS.
>
Right. So you are OK with having some basic API/SPI which will make it
possible for JSF or any other MVC framework integrate closer with JAX-RS
? This is what I expect from this work...
Cheers, Sergey