On 14/12/12 16:01, Bill Burke wrote:
> Now that we have DynamicFeature, should we ditch @NameBinding?
> @NameBinding is really just a convenience pattern and could be
> implemented within a DynamicFeature.
>
> Just a thought. Simplifies the spec.
>
> The only additional benefit @NameBinding would provide is the ability to
> dynamically add annotation bindings. But I don't have any use cases at
> the moment for this.
>
Seems like it is the usual code - vs annotations choice so probably both
styles needs to be supported
Cheers, Sergey