[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Ordering of global and name-bound filters

From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen <>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:48:16 -0400

On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:

> On 13/09/12 14:53, Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> When selecting the filters to be run, before a given selected resource method is invoked, what priority should be given to global filters as opposed to name-bound ones ?
>>> I know BindingPriority is there, but should name-bound filters be run first, and global filters afterwards, no matter of what their individual priorities are ?
>> No, they are part of the same "post-matching chain". Therefore, should be sorted by binding priority regardless of their kind.
> I still think it should be used at least as a secondary key, which will do well in cases where no BindingPriority is used on filters.

 There's always a default binding priority. I think this adds an extra rule to describe without any benefits. Priorities are inherent to filters/interceptors not the way they are bound IMO.

-- Santiago